Hale v. Arizona, No. 88-15785 (9th Cir.) (993 F.3d 1387) (May 4, 1993) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
In his dissent, Judge Norris stated: "The majority's analysis seems to boil down to the proposition that as long as Arizona law forces prisoners to work, the prisoners do not have to be paid. I simply fail to see the logical connection between the fact that the prisoners are forced …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login