Mora v. U.S., No. 91-2225, No. 318 (2nd Cir.) (955 F.2d 156) (January 22, 1992) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
Here the Court reversed the district court's ruling that the petitioner was not entitled to a remedy under Rule 41(e) for the return of property that the Government had lost, including damages - since the case was one at equity.
In this case the petitioner, acting pro se, filed a …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login