Skip navigation

U.S. v. Corcimiglia, No. 91-2290 (1st Cir.) (967 F.2d 724) (June 26, 1992) (Judge Jose Antonio Fuste)

Although the Court did not refer specifically to language like possession "in furtherance of," or "in relation to," it held that when (1) the weapon is readily available; (2) for the protection of the participants during the commission of the illegal activity or the drugs and cash involved, there is …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login