U.S. v. Curran, No. 90-1181 (1st Cir.) (926 F.2d 59) (February 14, 1991) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
Although the Court held that Rule 32 does not apply to information outside the presentence report, the Court did vacte the defendant's sentence which was based in part on ex parte victims' impact statements based on the court's supervisiory powers.
The Court stated: " there is no judicial precedent which …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login