U.S. v. Gaudet, No. 91-3647 (5th Cir.) (966 F.2d 959) (July 10, 1992) (Judge W. Eugene Davis)
Here the Court held that the failure of the defendant to raise on a timely basis the anti-alienation provisions of ERISA as a bar to court's order to relinquish a pension fund to satisy a restitution order was not plain error.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login