U.S. v. Giovanelli, No. 92-1737, No. 1320 (2nd Cir.) (998 F.2d 116) (July 6, 1993) (Judge Whitman Knapp)
Here the Court held that the district court which presided over the underlying crimial proceeding had jurisdiction over a Rule 41(e) motion brought after conclusion of the criminal matter even though the property was seized in a different district.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login