U.S. v. Harris, No. 92-5603 (4th Cir.) (995 F.2d 532) (June 14, 1993) (Judge James Marshall Sprouse)
Here the Court affirmed the district court's ruling excluding the proffered testimony of defendant's expert witness concerning psychological limitations on eyewitness identification on the grounds that such testimony was not inherently reliable.
The defendant in this case was arrested and charged with armed bank robbery. He admitted that he had …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login