U.S. v. Joseph, No. 89-3301 (6th Cir.) (914 F.2d 780) (September 19, 1990) (Per Curiam)
Case held that under Victim and Witness Protection Act, court could not require defendant to execute consent judgment or otherwise require him to secure payment of restitution "during and after the period of probation.".
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login