U.S. v. Kelly, No. HCR 90-72 (N.D.Ind.) (872 F.Supp. 556) (August 3, 1994) (Judge James T. Moody)
This case discusses the use of a motion under Rule 41(e) of the Fed.R.Crim.P. by a defendant to get his property back even after his criminal proceedings have been terminated. The court holds that it still has jurisdiction to hear the motion after the criminal proceedings have been terminated because …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login