Skip navigation

U.S. v. Ransom, No. 92-50102 (9th Cir.) (1993 WL 100158) (April 6, 1993) (Per Curiam)

Here the Court held that the district court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial despite the defendant's proof that the notorious DEA agent Andrew Chambers had perjured himself at the defendant's trial.

The Court held that "Chambers’s credibility [at trial] already was undermined significantly by his …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login