U.S. v. Watkins, No. 92-5830 (6th Cir.) (994 F.2d 1192) (June 1, 1993) (Judge Albert J. Engel)
The Court held that there are three limitations of the broad reach of the "intended loss" rule - the second of which was "that the intended loss must have been possible to be deemed relevant. U.S. v. Khan, 969 F.2d 218, 221 (6th Cir.1992) ("the fraud loss must reflect 'economic …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login