Zal v. Steppe, No. 91-55579 (9th Cir.) (968 F.2d 924) (July 1, 1992) (Judge Jerome Farris)
See Judge Trott's concurring opinion regarding jury nullification and his statement that a defendant has no right to present evidence that is irrelevant to a legal defense. (Id., at 930-31).
Case, involving an appeal by an attorney from a contempt citattion for violating a court's evidentiary orders, is noted for …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login