Rodriguez v. Lamer, No. 92-3142 (11th Cir.) (60 F.3d 745) (August 4, 1995) (Judge Harlington Jr. Wood)

Loaded on Aug. 1, 1995

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Community Confinement/Home Detention.

Case rejected claim that defendant's rights under the equal protection clause were violated because others had received credit for postrial custodial home detention and he did not for pretrial home detention.

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from these topics:

Eleventh Circuit Announces Defendant May Not Be Sentenced to Home Confinement for Violating Terms of Supervised Release When Sentenced to Statutory Maximum Period of Imprisonment for the Violation, Dec. 15, 2023. Community Confinement/Home Detention, Supervised Release - Imposition of New Term, Offense Statutory Maximum, Sentence, Statutory Maximum.
Settlement Reached Over COVID-19 Measures, Home Confinement Releases at FCC Lompoc, Oct. 15, 2023. Home Detention, COVID-19, Community Confinement/Home Detention.
Biden Commutes 31 Federal Drug Sentences, Aug. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, First Step Act, Community Confinement/Home Detention, Drug Laws/Offenses.
It’s Official: BOP Prisoners on Expanded COVID-19 Home Confinement Staying Put, June 15, 2023. COVID-19, Community Confinement/Home Detention.
Will Federal Prisoners on Home Confinement Have to Return to Prison?, Nov. 1, 2021. Community Confinement/Home Detention.
Police Funding Reallocated to Community Programs Nationwide, Aug. 15, 2021. Police Misconduct, Cost of Prison Systems, Community Confinement/Home Detention.
Last-Minute DOJ Order Clears Way for Possible Return of Home Confinees to Prison, March 1, 2021. Home Detention, COVID-19, Community Confinement/Home Detention.
Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.