U.S. v. Jones, No. 94-3107 (D.C. Cir.) (58 F.3d 688) (July 7, 1995) (Judge James L. Buckley)
Court expressed concerns about the Government's ability to "dangle" suggestions of a § 5K1.1 motion in front of defendant even when it knows that the defendant could not possibly provide it with the type of information needed for a downward departure.
Here's one of those Zap the Rat cases - …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login