U.S. v. Ledesma, No. 93-4316 (11th Cir.) (60 F.3d 750) (August 4, 1995) (Judge R. Lanier III Anderson)
Case held that restitution cannot be ordered for losses arising out of a separate crime for which the defendant was not convicted.
Here's an interesting restitution case where the defendant pled guilty to attempting to export two stolen cars in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 553(a) and he was ordered …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login