Skip navigation

U.S. v. Pulido, No. 94-3094 (7th Cir.) (69 F.3d 192) (November 2, 1995) (Judge John L. Coffey)

This case is cited only because it shows the double standards that are applied to Rule 403 of the Fed.
R.Evid. when a Government informant testifies and when he is cross-examined. That Rule says that
evidence must be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login