Skip navigation

Finn v. Schiller, No. 94-2373 (4th Cir.) (72 F.3d 1182) (January 3, 1996) (Judge Robert F. Chapman)

Case held that violations of Rule 6(e)(2) provide for both civil and criminal contempt, but do not crate a private cause of action.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login