U.S. v. Badru, No. 94-3163 (D.C. Cir.) (97 F.3d 1471) (October 4, 1996) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
One of the issues discussed in this case was the difference between "extrinsic" and "intrinsic" evidence of
prior bad acts under Rule 404(b). The defendants objected to the admission of evidence of a prior
involvement in a heroin smuggling operation - arguing that it was extrinsic or extraneous to the …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login