U.S. v. Cleary, No. 94-3290 (3rd Cir.) (46 F.3d 307) (January 27, 1995) (Judge Jane R. Roth)
One of the many cases involving an appeal based on a violation of Rule 11 of the Fed.R.Crim.P. where the Court dances between what the rule actually says and what it pretends the rule says. Here, despite the requirements of Rule 11(c) that the Court advise the defendant of the …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login