U.S. v. Cotal-Crespo, No. 94-1354 (1st Cir.) (47 F.3d 1) (January 30, 1995) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
Here the Court held that a series of Rule 11 violations that had occurred were merely "technical" in nature and were not violations of the Rule's "core concerns".
This is another fairly typical Rule 11 case where the court dances on the head of a pin to find a justification …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login