U.S. v. Crass, No. 94-1789 (1st Cir.) (50 F.3d 81) (March 24, 1995) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
Here the court held that "Intent, like any other elements of the crime charged, may not be contested by the defendant without jeopardizing an downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility under USSG § 3E1.1 (Id., at 84).
See also U.S. v. Bennett, 37 F.3d 687, 697 (1st Cir. 1994) where …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login