U.S. v. Duke, No. 93-3711 (8th Cir.) (50 F.3d 571) (March 20, 1995) (Judge Theodore McMillian)
Here the Court held that the perjured testimony of notorious DEA agent Andrew Chambers was not enough to grant a new trial because it was not reasonably likely to have affected the jury's decision in light of the other evidence.
The Court noted that “[t]he record . . . clearly …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login