U.S. v. Shoffner, No. 94-2585 (8th Cir.) (71 F.3d 1429) (December 21, 1995) (Judge David R. Hansen)
The Court holds that evidence that the defendant had been convicted six years previously on state drug
charges was admissible under Rule 404(b) to prove motive, intent, preparation, plan and knowledge in the
present case charging conspiracy to distribute marijuana.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login