U.S. v. Flowers, No. 94-5806 (6th Cir.) (55 F.3d 218) (May 26, 1995) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder)
Case held that while a check kiter is entitled to a reduction for any funds actually available in the accounts on which the checks were drawn, he is not entitled to a departure based on full restitution.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login