Skip navigation

U.S. v. Michalek, No. 94-1450 (7th Cir.) (54 F.3d 325) (April 26, 1995) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)

Court rejected contention that enhancements for more than minimal planning under § 2F1.1(b)(2) and aggravating role under § 3B1.1 constituted impermissible double counting.

There is a good listing, at 14 on page 334 of this case, of cases in most of the circuits that have approved the imposition of both …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login