Hamilton v. U.S., No. 94-56095 (9th Cir.) (67 F.3d 761) (September 5, 1995) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
In this case a sentence is vacated a second time because at the resentencing the court used the Guidelines in effect at the time of the resentencing, rather than the Guidelines in effect at the time of the offense, in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution. …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login