U.S. v. Acosta, No. 94-2047 (1st Cir.) (67 F.3d 334) (October 2, 1995) (Judge Michael Boudin)
Although the Court rejected the defendant's claim of entrapment in this case, it did warn of the potential for abuse when the Government uses informants both as a witness and as an instigator.
" In his dual role as both instigator and witness, the informant has a special capacity--as well …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login