U.S. v. Pipitone, No. 94-1690, No. 1637 (2nd Cir.) (67 F.3d 34) (October 3, 1995) (Judge J. Daniel Mahoney)
Case held that, despite district court's statement that it had misapprehended its legal authority at the time of the initial sentence, the district court had no authority to modify the sentence at a later date.
Long after his original sentence was imposed, the defendant in this case filed a § …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login