U.S. v. Garcia, No. 94-6673 (4th Cir.) (65 F.3d 17) (September 11, 1995) (Judge Kenneth K. Hall)
Over the dissent of Judge Murhaghan, the Court held that at the conclusion of criminal proceedings, jurisdiction to recover the return of seized property is proper only in the district where the property was seized, & not where the criminal case was.
In his dissent, Judge Murhaghan noted that "The …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login