U.S. v. Klaphake, No. 94-3864 (8th Cir.) (64 F.3d 435) (August 30, 1995) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
Court held that a party seeking to exempt a witness from sequestration must show that the witness had such specialized expertise or intimate knowledge of the facts of the case that the party could not function in the witness's absence.
Here's more clear proof of the double standards that exist …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login