U.S. v. Payne, No. 94-1613 (2nd Cir.) (63 F.3d 1200) (August 23, 1995) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
In this case, the Court agreed with the defendant that there had been a Brady rule violation because the Government had suppressed an affidavit that it knew about; but it held that the violation did not warrant a new trial because the suppressed evidence was not "material" within the meaning …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login