U.S. v. Thomas, No. 93-6673 (11th Cir.) (62 F.3d 1332) (September 5, 1995) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
This case is a good example of how the courts will stretch a word beyond its rational limits. Here, the investor who was defrauded was a sophisticated investor who had consulted with counsel before engaging in business with the investors. Despite that the court finds that the investor was a …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login