Skip navigation

U.S. v. Vance, No. 94-10245 (9th Cir.) (62 F.3d 1152) (August 7, 1995) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)

Here the Court holds that "the district court cannot consider the defendant's refusal to discuss the offense with the probation officer as evidence weighing against acceptance of responsibility.".

This case covers an important sentencing issue: does the defendant have to discuss his offense conduct with the probation officer? Here, even …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login