U.S. v. Garcia, No. 94-5216 (10th Cir.) (78 F.3d 1457) (February 22, 1996) (Judge David M. Ebel)
Loaded on April 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
April 22, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Factual Disputes/Findings.
Here the Court found no error in the district court's acceptance of statements of two informants to increase the drug quantities charged to the defendant, even though the Government itself argued that thie testimony was not credible.
This is one of those wild cases that tests the concept that evidence …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Garcia, No. 93-2512 (7th Cir.) (79 F.3d 74) (March 22, 1996) (Judge John L. Coffey)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 95-1425 (2nd Cir.) (78 F.3d 808) (March 11, 1996) (Judge Daniel M. Friedman)
- U.S. v. Young, No. 95-1746 (1st Cir.) (78 F.3d 758) (March 21, 1996) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. James, No. 95-3135 (3rd Cir.) (78 F.3d 851) (March 4, 1996) (Judge Max Rosenn)
- U.S. v. Spedden, No. Cr. No. 95-497-A (E.D.Va.) (917 F.Supp. 404) (March 1, 1996) (Judge James C. Cacheris)
- U.S. v. Quintero-Barraza, No. 93-10764 (9th Cir.) (78 F.3d 1344) (March 7, 1996) (Judge Robert R. Jr. Merhige)
- U.S. v. Dyce, No. 94-3171 (D.C. Cir.) (78 F.3d 610) (March 8, 1996) (Judge James L. Buckley)
- U.S. v. Stoller, No. 95-2175 (1st Cir.) (78 F.3d 710) (February 29, 1996) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Dyce, No. 94-3171 (D.C. Cir.) (78 F.3d 610) (March 8, 1996) (Judge James L. Buckley)
- U.S. v. Garcia, No. 94-4664 (11th Cir.) (78 F.3d 1517) (April 1, 1996) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Benson, No. 02-20184-TU (W.D.Tenn.) (917 F.Supp. 543) (November 22, 1995) (Judge Jerome Turner)
- U.S. v. Putra, No. 94-10040 (9th Cir.) (78 F.3d 1386) (March 5, 1996) (Judge Proctor Jr. Hug)
- U.S. v. Young, No. 95-1746 (1st Cir.) (78 F.3d 758) (March 21, 1996) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Crouse, No. 95-1189 (6th Cir.) (78 F.3d 1097) (March 18, 1996) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
- U.S. v. Crouse, No. 95-1189 (6th Cir.) (78 F.3d 1097) (March 18, 1996) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
- U.S. v. Merriweather, No. 93-4217 (6th Cir.) (78 F.3d 1070) (March 14, 1996) (Judge James L. Ryan)
- U.S. v. Neal, No. 94-5588 (4th Cir.) (78 F.3d 901) (March 20, 1996) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Talbott, No. 95-2503 (7th Cir.) (78 F.3d 1183) (March 8, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 95-1425 (2nd Cir.) (78 F.3d 808) (March 11, 1996) (Judge Daniel M. Friedman)
- U.S. v. Garcia, No. 94-5216 (10th Cir.) (78 F.3d 1457) (February 22, 1996) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Noushfar, No. 94-30229 (9th Cir.) (140 F.3d 1244) (March 20, 1996) (Judge Eugene A. Wright)
- U.S. v. Novey, No. 95-6249 (10th Cir.) (78 F.3d 1483) (March 15, 1996) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. James, No. 95-3135 (3rd Cir.) (78 F.3d 851) (March 4, 1996) (Judge Max Rosenn)
- U.S. v. Araujo, No. 95-1415, No. 817 (2nd Cir.) (79 F.3d 7) (March 8, 1996) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
- U.S. v. Thompson, No. 92-2601 (RCL) (D.D.C.) (917 F.Supp. 22) (February 23, 1996) (Judge Royce C. Lamberth)
- U.S. v. Noushfar, No. 94-30229 (9th Cir.) (140 F.3d 1244) (March 20, 1996) (Judge Eugene A. Wright)
- U.S. v. Brownstein, No. 95-50046 (9th Cir.) (79 F.3d 121) (March 21, 1996) (Judge Otto R. Jr. Skopil)
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Announces ‘Clear Error’ Review Applies to District Courts’ Factual Findings for Brady Challenges and Affirms District Court’s Mid-Trial Order Excluding Witness Testimony and Imposing Monetary Sanctions for Government’s Brady Violation, Feb. 1, 2025. Sanctions, Eyewitness Testimony, Brady Rule violations, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Factual Disputes/Findings, Legal or Factual Challenges - assertion of.
- Study: ‘Inconclusive Finding’ by Examiner of Cartridge Casing Should Be Finding of ‘Excluded’ 85% of the Time, Nov. 1, 2023. junk science, Evidence - Admissibility, Factual Disputes/Findings.
- California Court of Appeal: ‘Actual Killer’ Under Felony-Murder Rule Means Person ‘Who Personally Killed the Victim”, Feb. 15, 2023. Murder/Felony Murder, Factual Disputes/Findings.
- California Court of Appeal: At Felony-Murder Resentencing Hearing, Court May Not Deny Relief Based on Findings That Are Inconsistent With Previous Acquittal, Jan. 15, 2023. New Trial/Judgment of Acquittal, Resentencing, Factual Disputes/Findings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.