Skip navigation

U.S. v. Manning, No. 95-1199 (1st Cir.) (79 F.3d 212) (March 21, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)

Here the Court rejected a challenge based on the use of impermissible uncharged misconduct evidence, holding that the Court has often approved the use of prior narcotics involvement to prove motive and intent.

One of the many issues raised in this case was a challenge by the defendant to the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login