Skip navigation

U.S. v. Neal, No. 94-5588 (4th Cir.) (78 F.3d 901) (March 20, 1996) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)

Although the convictions in this drug case were affirmed, the decision is cited because Judge Motz
wrote one of her typically lucid decisions on two issues: the admissibility of a co-conspirator's hearsay
statements under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) of the Fed.R.Evid.; and the elusive meaning of the term "attempts"
under Federal law. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login