Skip navigation

U.S. v. Stoller, No. 95-2175 (1st Cir.) (78 F.3d 710) (February 29, 1996) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)

In his typical aesthetic style, Judge Selya rejects a claim that a previously entered FDIC debarment order precluded a subsequent criminal prosecution on double jeopardy grounds. The defendant argued that the permanent debarment order, entered under the authority of 12 U.S.C. ยง 1818(e)(1), was "punishment" - and thus barred the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login