Skip navigation

U.S. v. Aramony, No. 95-5532 (4th Cir.) (88 F.3d 1369) (July 17, 1996) (Judge Clyde H. Hamilton)

This is one of those cases that stretches the elastic limits of the term "relevant", as used in Rule 404(b) of
the Fed.R.Evid., to cover just about anything needed to obtain a conviction. Under that Rule, evidence of
other crimes and wrongs is not admissible to prove the character of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login