U.S. v. Askew, No. 94-3139 (D.C. Cir.) (88 F.3d 1065) (July 12, 1996) (Judge David S. Tatel)
Despite stating that it was "troubled by such testimony", the court rejected a claim that an expert witness' testimony, where he opined that the quantity of drugs possessed by the defendant signified a drug dealer, was improper.
The defendant in this case was charged with and convicted of possession of ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login