Skip navigation

U.S. v. Cali, No. 95-2271 (1st Cir.) (87 F.3d 571) (June 25, 1996) (Judge Hugh H. Bownes)

Court vacated a three level enhancement, holding that management responsibility over property, assets or activities is not a valid basis for such an enhancement.

If nothing else, this case proves that interpreting the Guidelines is often like dancing on the head of a needle. The principal issue here was the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login