Skip navigation

U.S. v. Catton, No. 95-2622 (7th Cir.) (89 F.3d 387) (July 11, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)

Here the Court vacated a conviction under 18 UCS § 287 because an expert witness falsely testified that he had obtained information from a neighboring grower of the same crops which indicated that there had been no drought in that area that year.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login