U.S. v. Fitzgerald, No. 95-50521 (5th Cir.) (89 F.3d 218) (July 12, 1996) (Judge John M. Jr. Duhé)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
August 19, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Drug Quantity.
Case held that the quantity of drugs under 21 USC § 844 is an essential element of the crime.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Trevino, No. 95-5359 (4th Cir.) (89 F.3d 187) (July 12, 1996) (Judge Kenneth K. Hall)
- U.S. v. Catton, No. 95-2622 (7th Cir.) (89 F.3d 387) (July 11, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Aramony, No. 95-5532 (4th Cir.) (88 F.3d 1369) (July 17, 1996) (Judge Clyde H. Hamilton)
- U.S. v. Pullen, No. 95-3790 (7th Cir.) (89 F.3d 368) (July 10, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Sanchez, No. 94-3086 (D.C. Cir.) (88 F.3d 1243) (July 19, 1996) (Judge James L. Buckley)
- U.S. v. Fitzgerald, No. 95-50521 (5th Cir.) (89 F.3d 218) (July 12, 1996) (Judge John M. Jr. Duhé)
- U.S. v. Fitzgerald, No. 95-50521 (5th Cir.) (89 F.3d 218) (July 12, 1996) (Judge John M. Jr. Duhé)
- U.S. v. Askew, No. 94-3139 (D.C. Cir.) (88 F.3d 1065) (July 12, 1996) (Judge David S. Tatel)
- U.S. v. Pullen, No. 95-3790 (7th Cir.) (89 F.3d 368) (July 10, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Askew, No. 94-3139 (D.C. Cir.) (88 F.3d 1065) (July 12, 1996) (Judge David S. Tatel)
- U.S. v. Askew, No. 94-3139 (D.C. Cir.) (88 F.3d 1065) (July 12, 1996) (Judge David S. Tatel)
More from these topics:
- Tenth Circuit, Joining Sister Circuits, Announces ‘Personal-Use’ Drug Quantity Doesn’t Constitute ‘Relevant Conduct’ Under Guidelines § 1B1.3(a) and Sets Forth Framework for Burden of Proof Analysis, Feb. 15, 2022. Drug Quantity, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Relevant Conduct.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.