Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Porter, No. 95-1219 (2nd Cir.) (90 F.3d 64) (July 23, 1996) (Judge Fred I. Parker)

Loaded on Aug. 1, 1996 published in Punch and Jurists August 26, 1996
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Ability to Pay.

United States v. Lampien, 89 F.3d 1316 (7th Cir. 1996) (Judge Rovner)
United States v. Porter, 90 F.3d 64 (2nd Cir. 1996) (Judge Parker)

Here are two restitution cases that show the controversy among Circuits - and even within Circuits - about the propriety of broad restitution orders that are ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Cowart, No. 95-5506 (6th Cir.) (90 F.3d 154) (July 22, 1996) (Judge James L. Ryan)
  2. U.S. v. Marmolejo, No. 94-60812 (5th Cir.) (89 F.3d 1185) (July 17, 1996) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)
  3. U.S. v. Lampien, No. 95-3396 (7th Cir.) (89 F.3d 1316) (July 12, 1996) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
  4. U.S. v. Porter, No. 95-1219 (2nd Cir.) (90 F.3d 64) (July 23, 1996) (Judge Fred I. Parker)
  5. U.S. v. Bruce, No. 95-3106 (D.C. Cir.) (89 F.3d 886) (July 26, 1996) (Judge Patricia M. Wald)
  6. U.S. v. Marmolejo, No. 94-60812 (5th Cir.) (89 F.3d 1185) (July 17, 1996) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)
  7. U.S. v. Lampien, No. 95-3396 (7th Cir.) (89 F.3d 1316) (July 12, 1996) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)

More from these topics: