Skip navigation

U.S. v. Morla-Trinidad, No. 96-1070 (1st Cir.) (100 F.3d 1) (November 8, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)

This case is noted because it discusses a mode of impeachment of a witness - namely, the so-called "impeachment exception to the exclusionary rule" - that is not specifically treated in the Federal Rules of Evidence, but rather falls in the general category of impeachment by contradiction and is governed ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login