Skip navigation

U.S. v. Morla-Trinidad, No. 96-1070 (1st Cir.) (100 F.3d 1) (November 8, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)

This case is noted because it discusses a mode of impeachment of a witness - namely, the so-called "impeachment exception to the exclusionary rule" - that is not specifically treated in the Federal Rules of Evidence, but rather falls in the general category of impeachment by contradiction and is governed …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login