Skip navigation

U.S. v. Rouse, No. 95-1554 (8th Cir.) (100 F.3d 560) (November 12, 1996) (Judge Myron H. Bright)

Because this case involves the ugly allegation of child abuse, it is one which normally would be ignored by most commentators. It is noted, however, because of its detailed analysis of the rules that apply to novel scientific testimony. Essentially, the Eighth Circuit vacated a series of convictions because the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login