Skip navigation

U.S. v. Van Thournout, No. 94-1599 (8th Cir.) (100 F.3d 590) (November 13, 1996) (Judge Theodore McMillian)

The defendant charged that the Government had breached its agreement to recommend concurrent sentences in two different districts; and the Government argued that promises made by a U.S. Attorney in one district are not binding on a U.S. Attorney in another district. The Court rejected that argument, holding that "absent ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login