Artuso v. Hall, No. 95-30619 (5th Cir.) (74 F.3d 68) (January 22, 1996) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
Case held that the Parole Commission does not have the authority to reimpose a term of special, rather than regular parole, following revocation.
This is a rare case in which a federal prisoner wins an appeal after alleging that certain regulations of the United States Parole Commission are inconsistent with ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login