Skip navigation

Chalmers v. Mitchell, No. 94-2672, No. 137 (2nd Cir.) (73 F.3d 1262) (January 3, 1996) (Judge Thomas J. Meskill)

Case affirms a conviction, deespite an erroneous jury instruction re: reasonable doubt, which Judge Newman wrote, in dissent, made it "highly likely" that the jury applied the wrong definition of reasonable doubt.

This is one of those perplexing cases that causes defendants, criminal lawyers and the public to wonder whether ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login