Chalmers v. Mitchell, No. 94-2672, No. 137 (2nd Cir.) (73 F.3d 1262) (January 3, 1996) (Judge Thomas J. Meskill)
Case affirms a conviction, deespite an erroneous jury instruction re: reasonable doubt, which Judge Newman wrote, in dissent, made it "highly likely" that the jury applied the wrong definition of reasonable doubt.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login