Peck v. U.S., No. 94-2444, No. 1021 (2nd Cir.) (73 F.3d 1220) (December 28, 1995) (Judge J. Daniel Mahoney)
This habeas case involves an appeal from a conviction for structuring cash transactions in violation of 31 U.S.C. §§ 5324(3), 5313(a) and 5322(a), because the jury instructions were erroneous in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Ratzlaf v. U.S., 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994). In that case the Supreme Court ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login